ABSTRACT
The bush mango "must"
Were made from the peeled and unpeeled fruit which were pitched with
suspensions of palm wine yeast. The physicochemical properties of the recovered
wine showed that unpeeled bush mango wine pH was 6.l2mg/100. Total titrable
acidity was l.8m1, specific gravity was l.o300mgll0oml, total Soluble solid
(Brix) was 13.700mg/100ml. total solid was found to be 17.56%, alcohol yield was
0.27%. The peeled sample showed also very mild acidity of 6.1 5pH value. Total
free acid was 2.34m1, specific gravity was 1.0300mg/100ml. total solid was
17.56mgll00ml and percentage alcohol of 0.27%. The two sample showed no
significant differences (p<0.05) confidence level. The two samples were
found to contain calcium, magnesium and sodium minerals. Sodium was the most
abundant mineral found in the two wine samples given 106.5% for the unpeeled
and 96.56% for the peeled. Magnesium content of the two Were almost near the
same value of 27.15% for the unpeeled and 25.25% for the peeled. Calcium was
also relatively the same in both samples. 30.8% calcium was recorded for the peeled
and 29.45% for the unpeeled. Tannins and flavonoid and were the only
antinutrients (photochemical) found. Tannins were more abundant than flavonoid
and were 1.26% for peeled 1.37% for the unpeeled. Flavonoids were trace in
amount and were 0.76% in the unpeeled and 0.45% in the peeled. Moisture and
carbohydrate constituted much of the proportion of the approximate and were
15.59% for carbohydrate while moisture was 82.05% for unpeeled, carbohydrate
for peeled was 22.3 9% while the moisture component was 76.4%. Ash, fat, fiber
and protein all occurred in very minute quantities in the two wine samples with
no significant difference. Sensory attributes of color, taste, flavor, mouth
feel and general acceptability revealed that the peeled sample was higher and
moderately liked with a value of 7, while the unpeeled was neither liked nor
disliked with a value of 5 on the Hedonic scale. Microbiological evaluation of
the wines revealed the absence of both bacteria and fungi in the pasteurized
wine samples.
ASOMUGHA, J (2021). Production And Evaluation Of African Bush Mango Wine (Irvingia gabonensis). Repository.mouau.edu.ng: Retrieved Nov 25, 2024, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-evaluation-of-african-bush-mango-wine-irvingia-gabonensis-7-2
JULIET, ASOMUGHA. "Production And Evaluation Of African Bush Mango Wine (Irvingia gabonensis)" Repository.mouau.edu.ng. Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 05 Aug. 2021, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-evaluation-of-african-bush-mango-wine-irvingia-gabonensis-7-2. Accessed 25 Nov. 2024.
JULIET, ASOMUGHA. "Production And Evaluation Of African Bush Mango Wine (Irvingia gabonensis)". Repository.mouau.edu.ng, Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 05 Aug. 2021. Web. 25 Nov. 2024. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-evaluation-of-african-bush-mango-wine-irvingia-gabonensis-7-2 >.
JULIET, ASOMUGHA. "Production And Evaluation Of African Bush Mango Wine (Irvingia gabonensis)" Repository.mouau.edu.ng (2021). Accessed 25 Nov. 2024. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-evaluation-of-african-bush-mango-wine-irvingia-gabonensis-7-2