ABSTRACT
The general objective of this study was to evaluate the
chemical and sensory properties of soymilk produced and stored using different
techniques. Soybean seeds were procured from Ubani Main Market in Umuahia, Abia
State. Soybean seeds were divided into three portions of 500g each for
processing of soymilk using three different techniques (SYM1, SYM2, and SYM3).
SYM1 was soaked, bleached for 30 minutes, manually dehaulled, washed milled and
simmered for 10 minutes. SYM2 was soaked for 9hrs, parboiled in water for 45
min, dehaulled, washed, milled, pasteurized for 1hr at 85 oC and
stored at 4-2 oC in refrigerator, SYM3 was soaked, for 11 hrs with
3g of sodium bicarbonate, dehaulled, washed, milled, strained with muslin cloth
and was stored at ambient temperature 12oC. The chemical composition
and microbial count of products were determined in the laboratory and sensory
evaluation of the soymilk samples were assessed by a 20-member panelist using
nine (9) point hedonic scale with 1 representing the least score (dislikes
extremely) and 9 the highest score (like extremely). Analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was performed on the data and mean differences were considered
significant at 95% confidence level (p<0.05). Result shows significant
differences (p<0.05) in the chemical composition parameters of samples.
Moisture content of SYM1 (86.34%), SYM2 (86.46%) and SYM3 (87.46%) were
significantly different (p<0.05) from each other. The protein content of
SYM2 (3.52%) was higher and significantly different (p<0.05) from SYM1
(3.47%) and SYM2 (3.46%) which had similar values (p<0.05). The fat content
of Soymilk SYM1 (1.90%) was significantly different from SYM2 (1.86%) and SYM3
(1.86%) which had similar values. In similar manner, the fibre content of
sample SYM1 (0.46%) significantly differed from SYM2 (0.43%) and SYM3 (0.39%).
The carbohydrate content of the Soymilk samples, SYM3 (6.06%) was significantly
different with SYM1 (7.09%). The energy value of the samples differed with each
other significantly (p<0.05). Anti-nutrient content of samples ranges were;
Tannins 0.57 – 3.61mg/100g, Saponin 3.51 – 3.57 mg/100g, Phytates: 0.77 – 0.85
mg/100 g and trypsin inhibitor 0.21-0.27 mg/100 mg. Tannin, Saponin, and
Phytates in sample SYM3 were significantly (p<0.05) different from SYM1 and
SYM2. The calcium (Ca) content of the Soymilk SYM1 (160.11 mg), SYM2 (156.90
mg) and SYM3 (156.90 mg) shows significant differences (p<0.05) from each
other. Magnesium (Mg) content of the Soymilk ranged from 14.76 to 15.45 mg/100g
and all the samples showed significant differences (p<0.05) from each other.
All the samples showed significant differences (p<0.05) in K among each
other ranged from 130.67 to 130.88 mg/100g. In similar manner, all the samples
showed significant differences (p<0.05) in P content among each other
ranging from 102.39 to 102.54 mg/100g. Iron (Fe) content ranged from 0.58 to
0.62 mg/100g and all the samples showed insignificant difference (p>0.05)
from each other. The zinc (Zn) content of the Soymilk samples were within the
range of 0.24 to 0.30 mg/100g. SYM1 and SYM2 were not different (p>0.05)
from each other. However, SYM3 differed significantly from SYM1 and SYM2.
Microbial count revealed that the Soymilk samples had less fungal and bacterial
count below the acceptable limit as established by regulatory agency. The
sensory evaluation showed that the Soymilk samples received general
acceptability (cumulative mean value of 7.4). There was no significant difference
(p<0.05) in mean response of the panelists on the appearance and mouth feel
of the product. However, there were significant differences (p<0.05) in the
taste, flavor and general acceptability of the product samples produced and
stored using different techniques. This study showed that the Soymilk samples
produced and stored using different techniques were nutritious and acceptable
to the panelists. More work was recommended to ascertain and improve the shelf
life of the Soymilk products.
CYNTHIA, C (2024). Chemical And Sensory Evaluation Of Soymilk Produced And Stored Using Different Techniques:- Mbamalu, Cynthia C. Repository.mouau.edu.ng: Retrieved Nov 23, 2024, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/chemical-and-sensory-evaluation-of-soymilk-produced-and-stored-using-different-techniques-mbamalu-cynthia-c-7-2
C, CYNTHIA. "Chemical And Sensory Evaluation Of Soymilk Produced And Stored Using Different Techniques:- Mbamalu, Cynthia C" Repository.mouau.edu.ng. Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 11 Sep. 2024, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/chemical-and-sensory-evaluation-of-soymilk-produced-and-stored-using-different-techniques-mbamalu-cynthia-c-7-2. Accessed 23 Nov. 2024.
C, CYNTHIA. "Chemical And Sensory Evaluation Of Soymilk Produced And Stored Using Different Techniques:- Mbamalu, Cynthia C". Repository.mouau.edu.ng, Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 11 Sep. 2024. Web. 23 Nov. 2024. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/chemical-and-sensory-evaluation-of-soymilk-produced-and-stored-using-different-techniques-mbamalu-cynthia-c-7-2 >.
C, CYNTHIA. "Chemical And Sensory Evaluation Of Soymilk Produced And Stored Using Different Techniques:- Mbamalu, Cynthia C" Repository.mouau.edu.ng (2024). Accessed 23 Nov. 2024. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/chemical-and-sensory-evaluation-of-soymilk-produced-and-stored-using-different-techniques-mbamalu-cynthia-c-7-2