ABSTRACT
Organic
amendments can affect soil properties. The predictive power of selected water
infiltration models in organic amended soils were evaluated. Ten (10)
infiltration models consisting of five (5) empirical (Philip (PH), Kostiakov
(KT), Modified Kostiakov (MK), Kostiakov-Lewis (KL) and Natural Resource
Conservative Service (NRCS)), Three (3) physically based (Green-Ampt (GA),
Smith-Parlange (SP), Talsma-Parlange (TP)) and two semiempirical (
Swartzendruber (SW) and Horton (HT)), were evaluated for soils amended with cow
dung, poultry litter and Pig dung. The study was carried out at University of
Uyo experimental plot at Uyo, Akwa Ibom. The field was ploughed to a depth of
20cm in order to mix the manure with the soil. Soil samples were taken from
each strip, and the tests were repeated two weeks, four weeks and six weeks
after manure application. Amendment with Cow dung, poultry litter, and pig dung
increased cumulative infiltration by 56.05%, 36.43, and 2.6% respectively. The
statistical model was used to evaluate the model performance. The coefficient
of determination R2 between the models simulated cumulative infiltration and
field measured cumulative infiltration ranged from 0.931 to 0.998. The value
ofthe modelling efficiency (E) index ranged from -0.048 to 0.998 while the Mean
Absolute Error (MAE) ranges from -0.955 to 5.454. The values of the coefficient
of residual mass (CRM) ranged from -1.320 to 0.572. Seven models (NRCS,
Philips, Kostiakov, Kostiakov-Lewis, Modified Kostiakov, Talsma-Parlange and
Swartzendruber’s model) under-predicted while three models (Green-Ampt,
Smith-Parlange and Horton) over-predicted cumulative infiltration. The NRCS’s
model had the overall best performance, while Kostiakov model had best
performance amongst the empirically based models.The Talsma-Parlange’s model
had the best performance in the physically based models, while Horton’s model
had the best performance in the semi-empirical group. The whole NRCS model was
found to be most appropriate for cow dung, Poultry litter, and the Control,
while Kostiakov model was found to be most suitable in the Pig dung amended soil
UDU, A (2025). Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients:- Udu Stephen A . Repository.mouau.edu.ng: Retrieved Mar 31, 2025, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-udu-stephen-a-7-2
AZUBUIKE, UDU. "Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients:- Udu Stephen A " Repository.mouau.edu.ng. Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 20 Mar. 2025, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-udu-stephen-a-7-2. Accessed 31 Mar. 2025.
AZUBUIKE, UDU. "Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients:- Udu Stephen A ". Repository.mouau.edu.ng, Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 20 Mar. 2025. Web. 31 Mar. 2025. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-udu-stephen-a-7-2 >.
AZUBUIKE, UDU. "Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients:- Udu Stephen A " Repository.mouau.edu.ng (2025). Accessed 31 Mar. 2025. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-udu-stephen-a-7-2