ABSTRACT
Organic amendments can affect soil properties.
The predictive power of selected water infiltration models in organic amended
soils were evaluated. Ten (10) infiltration models consisting of five (5)
empirical (Philip (PH), Kostiakov (KT), Modified Kostiakov (MK),
Kostiakov-Lewis (KL) and Natural Resource Conservative Service (NRCS)), Three
(3) physically based (Green-Ampt (GA), Smith-Pariange (SP), Talsma-Parlange
(TP)) and two semiempirical ( Swartzendruber (SW) and Horton (HT)), were
evaluated for soils amended with cow dung, poultry litter and Pig dung. The
study was carried out at University of Uyo experimental plot at Uyo, Akwa Ibom.
The field was ploughed to a depth of 20cm in order to mix the manure with the
soil. Soil samples were taken from each strip, and the tests were repeated two
weeks, four weeks and six weeks after manure application. Amendment with Cow
dung, poultry litter, and pig dung increased cumulative infiltration by 56.05%,
36.43, and 2.6% respectively. The statistical model was used to evaluate the
model performance. The coefficient of determination Rz between the models
simulated cumulative infiltration and field measured cumulative infiltration
ranged from 0.931 to 0.998. The value ofthe modelling efficiency (£) index
ranged from -0.048 to 0.998 while the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) ranges from
-0.955 to 5.454. The values of the coefficient of residual mass (CRM) ranged
from -1.320 to 0.572. Seven models (NRCS, Philips, Kostiakov, Kostiakov-Lewis,
Modified Kostiakov, Talsma-Parlange and Swartzendruber’s model) under-predicted
while three models (Green-Ampt, Smith-Parlange and Horton) over-predicted
cumulative infiltration. The NRCS’s model had the overall best performance,
while Kostiakov model had best performance amongst the empirically based
models.The Talsma-Parlange’s model had the best performance in the physically
based models, while Horton’s model had the best performance in the
semi-empirical group. The whole NRCS model was found to be most appropriate for
cow dung, Poultry litter, and the Control, while Kostiakov model was found to
be most suitable in the Pig dung amended soil.
IGBOANUGO, E (2025). Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients :- Igboanugo Ikechukwu E. Repository.mouau.edu.ng: Retrieved Sep 02, 2025, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-igboanugo-ikechukwu-e-7-2
EMMANUEL, IGBOANUGO. "Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients :- Igboanugo Ikechukwu E" Repository.mouau.edu.ng. Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 01 Sep. 2025, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-igboanugo-ikechukwu-e-7-2. Accessed 02 Sep. 2025.
EMMANUEL, IGBOANUGO. "Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients :- Igboanugo Ikechukwu E". Repository.mouau.edu.ng, Repository.mouau.edu.ng, 01 Sep. 2025. Web. 02 Sep. 2025. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-igboanugo-ikechukwu-e-7-2 >.
EMMANUEL, IGBOANUGO. "Calibration Of Existing Infiltration Models On Soil Amended By Three Different Organic Nutrients :- Igboanugo Ikechukwu E" Repository.mouau.edu.ng (2025). Accessed 02 Sep. 2025. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/calibration-of-existing-infiltration-models-on-soil-amended-by-three-different-organic-nutrients-igboanugo-ikechukwu-e-7-2