Relative Technical Change And Production Efficiency Of Male And Female Smallholder Arable Crop Farm Households In Abia State, Nigeria
Subscribe to read and download this work.
ABSTRACT
This study on the relative technical change and production efficiency of male and female smallholder arable crop farm households was carried out in Abia State. The socio-economic characteristics of the female and male heads of households were cross-tabulated with access to credit, farm size, labour use and depreciated value of farm tools. The study also estimated and compared the production function, profit function and efficiency measures of the male and female arable crop households. The relative technical change in the output of the household head was also determined. The data were collected through cost route using a structured questionnaire. Eighty households were sampled (40 male and 40 female headed). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, stochastic production frontier functions, z-test, efficiency indices, profit function and chow’s tests. The results showed that the female headed households had less access to credit, land, labour and farm tools than the male headed households. The result also showed that labour and farm size were positively related to the output of the female headed households while farm tools was negatively related to the output of the female headed households. For male headed households, farm tools was negatively related to the output of the male headed households and farm size and planting materials were positively related to output of the male headed households. Also, output (in naira) was higher for male headed households than for female headed households. For female headed households, land was underutilized while labour and farm tools were overutilized. The male headed households underutilized land and planting materials and overutilized farm tools. Both households were inefficient in the use of all resources. The female headed households were technically, economically and allocatively more efficient than the male headed households. Household size, farm tools, farm size and price of labour, positively and significantly influenced profit of female headed households and price of agrochemical, price of fertilizer and price of planting material were significant and negatively influenced the profit of female headed households while household size and farm size were significant and positively influenced the profit of the male headed households. Age, price of fertilizer, price of labour and price of output, negatively and significantly respectively influenced the profit of the male headed households. The profit of the male headed households was higher than the profit of the female headed households. The result also showed that there was a technical difference between the output of the male and female headed households. The difference between the outputs of the household heads was due to the sex of the household head. This study recommend that government should enact polices that provide and expand agricultural credit facilities to ensure that farm households have improved access to credit. This may require a review of the community and rural banking schemes to bring credit facilities to the door steps of farm households in rural areas.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Declaration ii
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgements v
Table of Contents vi
List of Tables x
List of Figures xii
Abstract xiii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Information 1
1.2 Problem Statement 3
1.3 Objectives of the Study 4
1.4 Hypotheses 5
1.5 Justification for the Study 5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Conceptual Literature 8
2.1.1 Household 8
2.1.2 Household heads 8
2.1.3 Arable crop farming 10
2.1.4 Small holder arable crop farm and farm size 11
2.1.5 Scale of production 12
2.1.6 Credit 13
2.1.7 Labour 14
2.1.8 Land 15
2.1.9 Production 18
2.1.10 Concept of efficiency 25
2.1.11 Stochastic frontier approach 26
2.1.12 Technical change 32
2.1.13 Profit function 32
2.2 Conceptual Framework 37
2.3 Theoretical Literature 38
2.3.1 Theories of production 38
2.3.2 Theories of profit 39
2.3.3 Theories of efficiency 41
2.4 Empirical Literature 42
2.4.1 Socio-economic characteristic and output of farm households 42
2.4.2 Production functions of female and male headed households 45
2.4.3 Efficiency measures of female and male headed households 46
2.4.4 Profit functions of female and male headed households 48
2.5 Analytical Tools 49
2.5.1 Mean 49
2.5.2 Frequency distribution 50
2.5.3 Z- test 50
2.5.4 Regression analysis 51
2.5.5 Chow’s test 52
2.5.6 Resource-Use efficiency index 53
2.5.7 Technical efficiency 54
2.5.8 Profit function 56
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
3.1 Study Area 57
3.2 Sampling Procedure 59
3.3 Data Collection 60
3.4 Analytical Technique 60
3.5 Measurements of Variables 68
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Socio-economic Characteristics of Female and Male Heads of
Arable Crop Farm Households 71
4.1.2 Socio-economic characteristics of female and male heads of arable
crop farm households in relations to access to credit, farm size, labour
and farm tools 73
4.1.2.1 Access to credit 73
4.1.2.2 Access to farm size 75
4.1.2.3 Access to labour use 78
4.1.2.4 Depreciated value of farm tools 82
4.2 Production Function of the Female, Male and Pooled Headed Households 90
4.2.1 Stochastic production frontier function of the female, male
and pooled headed households 84
4.2.2 Frequency distribution of respondent according to technical efficiency
indices 90
4.3 Allocative and Economic Efficiency Measures of the Male and Female
Headed Households 92
4.3.1 Stochastic cost function of the female, male and pooled headed
households 94
4.3.2 Frequency distribution of respondents according to economic efficiency 96
4.3.3 Allocative efficiency of the male, female headed Households 98
4.4 Technical Change between the Output of the Male and Female Headed
Households 100
4.4.1 Test for the equality of the coefficients 100
4.4.2 Test for structural difference in the coefficients 101
4.4.3 Test for the heterogeneity of the intercepts 102
4.4.4 Testing for the homogeneity of slope 103
4.5 Assessment of the Relative Resource Use Efficiencies of the Male,
Female and Pooled Farm Households 104
4.6 Net Farm Income and Profit Functions of the Female and Male
Headed Households 108
4.6.1 Profit functions of the female and male headed households 110
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary 118
5.2 Conclusion 121
5.3 Recommendations 121
5.4 Contribution to Knowledge 122
References 123
LIST OF TABLES
4.1 Socio-economic characteristics of respondents 71
4.2 Statistical test of differences between means of age, education,
farming experience and output of male and female heads of
households 72
4.3 Access to credit in relation to age, level of education, sex
and farming experience 73
4.4 Farm size in relation to age, level of education, sex
and farming experience and test of significance difference 75
4.5 Labour use in relation to age, level of education, sex
and farming experience and test of significance difference 78
4.6 Age, level of education, sex and farming experience in relation
to depreciated value of farm tools and test of significance difference 82
4.7 Estimated stochastic production frontier function for the male
and female headed households and pooled 84
4.8 Frequency distribution of the male and female headed households
and pooled according to technical efficiency indices 90
4.9 Estimated stochastic cost function for the male and female headed
households and pooled 94
4.10 Frequency distribution of the male and female headed households
and pooled according to economic efficiency indices 96
4.11 Frequency distribution of the male and female headed households
and pooled according to allocative efficiency indices 98
4.12 Anova results of the determinants of the output of the male and
female headed households and pooled 101
4.13 Resource use efficiency for the male and female headed households
and pooled 105
4.14 Net farm income of the male and female headed households 108
4.15 Comparison of the profit of the female and male headed households 109
4.16 Estimated profit function for the female headed households 110
4.17 Estimated profit function for the male headed households 114
LIST OF FIGURES
2.1 Total production or response curve 20
2.2 Production function curve 21
2.3 Linkage between resources and output/profit 37
3.1 Map of Abia State showing 17 local Government
Areas of the State 58
Reviews
No reviews yet.
APA
ONYEBINAMA, & CHARITY, I. (2023). Relative Technical Change And Production Efficiency Of Male And Female Smallholder Arable Crop Farm Households In Abia State, Nigeria. Michael Okpara University of Agriculture. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from http://repository.mouau.edu.ng/works/relative-technical-change-and-production-efficiency-of-male-and-female-smallholder-arable-crop-farm-households-in-abia-state-nigeria-7-2
MLA
ONYEBINAMA, and IFEOMA CHARITY. "Relative Technical Change And Production Efficiency Of Male And Female Smallholder Arable Crop Farm Households In Abia State, Nigeria." Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, 14 Aug. 2023, http://repository.mouau.edu.ng/works/relative-technical-change-and-production-efficiency-of-male-and-female-smallholder-arable-crop-farm-households-in-abia-state-nigeria-7-2. Accessed June 7, 2026.
Chicago
ONYEBINAMA, and IFEOMA CHARITY. "Relative Technical Change And Production Efficiency Of Male And Female Smallholder Arable Crop Farm Households In Abia State, Nigeria." Michael Okpara University of Agriculture (2023). Accessed June 7, 2026. http://repository.mouau.edu.ng/works/relative-technical-change-and-production-efficiency-of-male-and-female-smallholder-arable-crop-farm-households-in-abia-state-nigeria-7-2